Structured theological research
Begin with a question.
AbrahamMoses keeps what a text says apart from how each tradition reads it, records what every conclusion rests on, and lets you reject an assumption to see what follows — without altering a single source.
Listed in the historical order of the traditions whose questions they are.
01 · Research
A worked answer, from the record
What changed concerning priesthood under the New Covenant?
Hebrews explicitly identifies Jesus as high priest after the order of Melchizedek and argues that a change of priesthood entails a change of law. That much is a report of the text. Whether the Levitical priesthood is thereby superseded, and what follows for priesthood in the church, are interpretations — and that is where Christian traditions divide among themselves, and where Rabbinic Judaism dissents.
What the texts say
Hebrews identifies Jesus as High Priest according to the order of Melchizedek.
Hebrews 5:6; Hebrews 6:20; Hebrews 7:17 · textual certainty: Secure
Jeremiah announces a new covenant that is not like the covenant made at Sinai.
Jeremiah 31:31-34 · textual certainty: Strong
Psalm 110 addresses a figure who is declared a priest forever after the order of Melchizedek.
Psalm 110:1; Psalm 110:4 · textual certainty: Strong
Where interpretation begins
The Melchizedekian priesthood of Christ supersedes the Levitical priesthood and its sacrificial order.
Rests on 2 derivation(s); requires AM-AX-001, AM-AX-002
The Levitical priesthood is suspended by the loss of the Temple, not superseded: no later priesthood abrogates the Torah’s priestly order.
Rests on 2 derivation(s); requires AM-AX-005, AM-AX-004
Challenge an assumption
Reject AM-AX-002 — Figures prefigure fulfilment (Typological (Patristic, Catholic, Orthodox)):
- AM-CLAIM-000191: Support weakened
- AM-CLAIM-000197: Supported under selected assumptions
- Across the record: 0 not established under the selected assumptions, 5 with support weakened or only partial. No source changed.
Every line above is a public record with a code; nothing on this page is generated. Records marked provisional await editorial verification.
02 · The method
Certainty decreases exactly where interpretation begins
Six connected layers hold the evidence. Confidence is recorded on separate axes that are never combined, and every conclusion records the derivations it rests on — so setting one assumption aside affects only what genuinely needs it.
The sources, cited by edition and classified by provenance.
What the evidence establishes, one revisioned claim at a time.
Where a passage sits in each tradition’s covenantal history.
How ideas connect, with evidence on every edge.
How communities read the texts, in their own categories.
Retrieval, comparison and the dependency model.
Five measures, never one score
- Textual certainty — Is the wording the claim relies on securely established in the witnesses?
- Philological certainty — How securely is the meaning of the wording established?
- Historical support — What does evidence outside the claim’s own tradition support?
- Inferential strength — How strongly does the claim follow from its stated premises?
- Traditional acceptance — recorded per tradition, as affirms, qualifies, disputes, rejects or does not address.
Exact dependency logic
- A conclusion with two independent arguments survives the loss of one.
- A report of what a text says keeps its standing when a reading of it is rejected.
- Circular support never establishes anything.
- Rival readings are shown on both sides; the dispute is never declared settled.
03 · Explore the record
The public record
04 · For institutions and developers
One host, two interfaces, tested end to end
MCP server
For AI agents and research tools. Streamable HTTP; tools, resources and prompts; read-only.
https://abrahammoses.com/mcp
REST API v1
For applications. JSON with published schemas, an OpenAPI document and stable error codes.
https://abrahammoses.com/api/v1
05 · About AbrahamMoses
Who stands behind the record
AbrahamMoses is a research product written, built and owned by Sagolik. It is not an accredited institution. Every record names its author, its review state and whether machine assistance was involved; corrections are appended as new revisions, never made silently.